[gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- From: RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:53:12 -0500
I agree with your proposal. I guess that's a "no" vote, right? "No"
multiple sample types in a single binary.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Hockin [mailto:thockin@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:49 AM
To: GMPI list
Subject: [gmpi] on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
Let's wrap this up, lest we lose the momentum and start over?
Issue: Should we build support for multiple sample datatypes into GMPI?
Proposal: Each plugin identifies it's IO type, the host uses GMPI-provided
converter routines to do conversions only when needed.
Basically, there are 4 'NO' votes and two 'PERHAPS' votes. Being one of the
'PERHAPS' people, I'm willing to concede.
Unless any more voices chime in, I think this issue is coming to a close?
Last chance for anyone who wants to express an opinion (dissenting or not
:)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following
rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words.
Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone
else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)