On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:06:44PM -0500, Ron Kuper wrote: > >>> > All things are not objects. Sometimes, they really are just functions. > <<< > > All things _are_ objects. Functions are what you do to them. > Nouns/verbs. Sometimes you make up a noun to have a verb. Anytime you have a class whose existence is to hold a method, I question it's validity. Maybe it's just my own skew of OO, then. Any class that ends in "er" is suspect. FooFrobber ThingPasser ObjectMaker etc. > In my experience, a naked standalone function is simply a placeholder > for an underspecified or underdeveloped object. OK, but really this is moot. What I was suggesting is that the factor is moot here because all it does is add a level of indirection to the dll enumerator function. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe