[gmpi] Re: low level API - Abstract Factory summary
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:30:50 -0500
>I'd like to see us cherry pick the best ideas from COM, but still keep
>the interface as streamlined as possible. For starters this could mean
>getting rid of reference counting and limiting the set of interfaces to
>avoid many small ephemeral objects floating around.
i'm loving it.
>Every GMPI module (DLL, whatever) then needs to expose one global entry
>point, a "get factory" function.
>
>Thoughts?
totally agreed. but isn't this true of all plugin API's anyway?
--p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
