[gmpi] Re: low level API - Abstract Factory summary

  • From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:13:54 -0800

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> this is not the same situation as you describe for COM. but i just
> have a bad feeling about the assumption that you can write a single
> interface and assume that it works for C and C++
> "natively". obviously, any C interface (more or less) can be in C++
> but only in the "C-like" way. This is part of the reason that a number
> of us insisted on C as the implementation language for the spec.

I too feel dirty about this.  I'm trusting the C++ experts on this, but
it feels very delicate to me...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: