[gmpi] Re: low level API - Abstract Factory summary

  • From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:13:54 -0800

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> this is not the same situation as you describe for COM. but i just
> have a bad feeling about the assumption that you can write a single
> interface and assume that it works for C and C++
> "natively". obviously, any C interface (more or less) can be in C++
> but only in the "C-like" way. This is part of the reason that a number
> of us insisted on C as the implementation language for the spec.

I too feel dirty about this.  I'm trusting the C++ experts on this, but
it feels very delicate to me...

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: