[gmpi] Re: low level API - Abstract Factory summary
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:05:34 -0500
>Totally agree. GMPI COM doesn't have to match Microsoft's syntax, and
>there's good reason not to.
>
>status_t GMPI_CreateFactory( UUID uuid, GMPI_Factory** factory_ptr_ptr );
>
>Is that better? <g>
alright, alright, i get the point folks :)
but now a serious question. how does the above example look to you?
because, as petty and pathetic and appalling as it may be, the version
you wrote above makes me feel good and the other version makes me feel
horrible. is that a symmetrical experience for you?
--p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
