[gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: "Koen Tanghe" <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:39:58 +0200
On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:06 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Tim Hockin <xxxthockin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replying to myself:
>
> What I posted sounded more like a spec than reqs. How about this:
>
> 3.13. Latency
>
> Req 60: GMPI plugins must report their latency when queried by the
> host.
>
> Req 61: Plugins must be able to change their latency, when allowed by
> the host.
>
> [more...]
>
> It must be possible for plugins to change their reported latency.
> However, it may be too much to allow them to change it whenever they
> want. The following conditions are suggested for the specification of
> plugin latency reporting:
>
> * Plugins may change their latency whenever they are queried by the
> host.
> * Hosts may query or not query plugins as often as they see fit.
This sounds good to me.
"Ideally" it would be great if the graph could adapt to a plugin latency
change on the fly of course, but I can see that hosts would have a hard time
handling this robustly.
Koen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
