[gmpi] Re: gmpi Digest V1 #65 topic: Inter-parameter linkages
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:19:04 +0100
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:39:07 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 07:20:37PM +1200, jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Well, if there is a sane way for the DSP to send ITSELF
> > events...
> >
> > THAT is the real question. That question is the cause of
> > this entire discussion.
>
> And the answer that we've converged upon is to split the logic into two
> plugins - one plugin handles the logic of sending events to the other
> plugin which handles DSP. I can live with that. It doesn't violate any
> of our assumtions so far. We may be able to do better with the real final
> implementation, but for now, it makes perfect logical sense.
>
> But it has to be treated as a plugin and called from process() loops.
Surely at that point you may as well not have bothered - wasn't the idea
that the actor is non-realtime?
If calling the actor causes parameters in the DSP code to be updated and
you call it from inside process(), then you've back at square 1.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
