[gmpi] a little order?

  • From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:33:17 -0500

can i suggest that we perhaps follow a slightly more orderly approach,
at least to start? folks familiar with LAD will know how conversations
like this can rapidly swing into a multiplicity of different
orthogonal orbits.

since the purpose of the discussion is to frame the requirements for a
"unified" plugin API, i'd humbly suggest that we start by listing
things that we specifically do or do not like about existing plugin
APIs. no solutions, no new designs - just list the things that are
either problematic and need replacing/providing, or things that are so
great you wouldn't want them to go away. remember non-audio/MIDI
plugin APIs as well, if that seems relevant.


Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: