On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:55:34AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 03:15:09 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > boundary. Limiting the use of MIDI messages in GMPI to just the > > > standardized meanings would kind of suck IMHO. MIDI was never meant > > > to be limited in that way. > > > > Oh, no, no such limit needs to exist. That would be bad bad bad. > > Disagree, MIDI is complex and we probably dont want to ecapsulate every > variation on it (eg. all the forms of SYSEX), so just let people blash out > known-typed blobs that will be sent out at the edge of the graph as midi > bytes and used as blobs internally. SysEx, yeah. I meant just unnamed CC numbers should still work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe