[gmpi] Re: Topic 8: Parameters
- From: Marc Poirier <fipnid@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
--- Chris Grigg wrote:
> Of course, and I agree... except where you say I propose a limitation.
>
> You seem to assume that I'm saying only parameter 0 could be a blob,
> but I'm not. Any param index should have the option to be a blob. So
> no limitation, eh? The idea is only to establish a uniform
> convention that you can save/restore plug state in a uniform way
> through the parameter interface.
Okay, so you're saying that param 0 must be a blob, even though it might
be an empty blob, and there might still be other blobs, but param 0 is
always a blob, whether valid or not (size 0). What good does that do
anyone? Let's just make as many blobs as we want (from 0 to infinity) and
place them where ever they make sense in the parameter list. I see no
advantage to your idea, and only an annoying, arbitrary rule. Maybe I
still just don't get it...
Marc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
