On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:19:58 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > > This is fine, you have to explicitly put a de-multiplexer to get step a, > > step c will kill anything that cannot be represented in the mutiplexed > > form, c.f. Dolby Pro-Logic. > > > Sure, this is what happens, pro-logic will survive some processings an not > > others, people are familair with this situation. > > Wasn't it you you who was just saying that "Worrying about matrix encoded > LCRS streams in stereo is just splitting hairs. People are used to seeing > stuff like that come out of left and right outputs of boxes." ? Maybe I > misunderstood what you meant. I took it to mean that you were against > encodings of this sort, but on re-reading it, I guess maybe not. When I said the thing you quoted I meant exactly what I wrote just now, maybe I wasn't clear enough. > a) Protect the integrity of the encoded stream? Plugins must > explicitly support an encoding, or the host should complain about the > connection. Connecting LtRt to a stereo reverb should be denied, or the > host should ask the user. > > b) Enable plugins just to get extra information (if they care)? Plugins > only know nchannels, and it is up to the user not to do anything dumb. > Connecting LtRt to a stereo reverb is silently accepted. I'd go for b, from what I remeber its a valid operation to apply stereo reverb to mutiplexed LCRS streams. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe