[gmpi] Re: Topic 7.1: Channel Formats
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 17:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
> IEEE1394 etc), and it didn't handle various encodings, do you doubt
> that people would still use it? don't you think they would just sigh
> that audio manufacturers could not agree on encodings, let alone make
> them all open, royalty and license free? don't you think they'd just
> get a 2-way converter to run <your-encoding-here> into and out the
> box?
>
> why are we doing things differently? if there are encodings that
> discard information, why are they of interest? for encodings that do
> not throw away information, why not use an alternate representation
> that is a single, standard representation (e.g. mono 32 bit float
> streams)?
All this was originally a disucssion with Bill advocating multiple
encodings. Bill - are you here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
