[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Bill Gardner <billg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:14:47 -0400
At 01:27 PM 5/22/03 -0600, you wrote:
probably simply not load plugins that don't take uninterleaved buffers.
How do the plugin writers feel about this?
Our processing code is all non-interleaved. Our DirectX adaptor
de-interleaves the incoming data and interleaves the result. I haven't
noticed any performance degradation, the overhead is quite small compared
to the processing in the plug.
I imagine most hosts and plugs use non-interleaved data, and if so it would
make sense to use non-interleaved. At the same time, it's trivial to
convert, so I have no problem accepting interleaved data.
I think it would be a mistake to mandate interleaved data only, but I
really don't mind supporting both if certain host authors think it's
important :-)
Bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
