[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:05:37 +0100
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:09:52 -0700, Chris Grigg wrote:
> Needing a zero-buffer strikes me as a choice that only the plug
> author can correctly make, and conversely requiring all GMPI hosts to
> always furnish zero-buffers to all non-user-connected inputs seems
> like a possible source of system-wide inefficiency. Consider a
Er, there only needs to be one buffer of 0.0's per host, its never written
to.
> utility mixer that scales N active inputs to avoid clipping; in that
> case, knowing that an input is semantically unconnected makes a
> difference in how the plug processes every other input, and
> unconnected inputs are not processed at all. So automatically
Yes, thats why theres a function call (or whatever) to detect if a port is
unconnected.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
