[gmpi] Re: Topic 6: Time representation
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:22:37 +0100
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:35:02AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> My position:
>
> If Hammer is equally good at 32 bit and 64 bit : go 32 bit.
> If Hammer is better at 64 bit, be forward looking and go 64 bit.
If its defined carefully, plugins that (dont) care could cast the 64bit
timestamp down to 32bits for more speed on 32bit architectures.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
