> What I'm thinking is basically that if sub-sample timestamp support > can be made very simple and low cost, we might as well have it, just > in case, and for those few cool applications. If it gets hairy, we > need some strong reasons to work on it and squeeze it in. If those > reasons don't exist, we should drop it. With full respect to David. I'm opposed to adding features we 'might need'. It's very easy for a spec to get bloated with features that sound cool, but never get used. Having 99% of plugins perform extra math on the timestamps seems inefficient to me (not a huge overhead though I admit). Best Regards, Jeff M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe