[gmpi] Re: Topic 6: Time representation
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:46:48 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederick Umminger" <Frederick_Umminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 12:18 AM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Topic 6: Time representation
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Burel [mailto:vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> >seems you never work in studio , or in audio production, and seems you
don't
> >know how to compute the rate of a 32000 bauds serial interface.
> >
>
> Seems you never composed. Not all MIDI data streams originate from a human
performance.
:-) when you use the "it seems " in this way , you have to be sure of what
you are saying. otherwise it's not funny ! :-)
> It also seems you are not up on the current technology. Nowadays plenty of
MIDI
> data streams are sent over USB or Firewire. Those have significantly
higher bandwidth
> and lower latency than the original physical layer of MIDI.
So if i understand well , you say that there is no problem of time precision
with M.I.D.I. because we can transmit M.I.D.I. by firewire or T1000
Ethernet. people who complaint about M.I.D.I. time precision are people like
me who don't know about new technologies. Is it the official statement of
Digidesign or what ! ? may i use your argument to reply to some of my client
who complaint against M.I.D.I. management in their audiosoftware !? :-))
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
