[gmpi] Re: Topic 6: Time representation
- From: "Angus F. Hewlett" <amulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Chris Grigg wrote:
> >Consider the following simple scenario:-
> >
> >Host -> Midi..Midi processing plug -> Midi..Audio processing plug
(snip)
> >The other option is to provide a seperate class of port (event queue) for
> >parameter events.
> I had a different vision, I thought that each plug would have the
> option of whether or not to pass-through incoming events to its
> output pins. So if you have a seq track and wanted the notes to go
> to multiple synths, you'd patch a line from the track music event out
> pin to the 1st synth's music event in pin, and a second line from the
> same place to the 2nd synth's music event in pin.
That sounds sensible, and I'm not sure how my above ideas contradict
that... in the scenario I outlined, the MIDI..MIDI plug is e.g. some kind
of arpeggiator which is transforming the MIDI stream received by the
MIDI..Audio (synth) plug.
Regards,
Angus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
