[gmpi] Re: Topic 6: Time representation
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
> struct MeterEvent
> {
> int64 timestamp;
> int32 barNumber;
> int32 barSubdivision;
> int64 eventDuration;
> };
>
> The advantage that I see is that then you never have to send tempo
> events. The tempo is inherent in the meter events. This makes the
> plugins less prone to error, since adjusting for changing tempos can be
> very complex code. Here the host does all of it for the plugin.
It's interesting, but I think it is OT for the current thread - can you
bring this back up when it's time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
