[gmpi] Re: Topic 1: Audience for and users of plugins

  • From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:03:55 -0500

>-- are we interested in possible networked plugins? or is the general
>feeling that by the time GMPI is adopted, CPUs will be so fast that this
>is irrelevant ((it's already close... Steinberg's System Link does not
>seem to have had all that wide an adoption, implying it's not an important
>requirement for most people NOW, and will decline in importance with time

SystemLink can't be widely adopted unless Steinberg opens it up
(though the technology is simple - its the idea that was
brilliant). But more to the point, i don't think that network
communication needs to be part of GMPI. its orthogonal to almost
everything that GMPI needs to concern itself with.

that is, i believe that GMPI will be (and rightfully should be)
neutral about networked plugins.

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: