[gmpi] Re: Topic 1: Audience for and users of plugins

  • From: "Mikael Hillborg" <mikael@xxxxxx>
  • To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:43:38 +0100

> You don't have to make I/O an integral part of the host, using "fake" 
> plugins or whatever to present the devices in the net. Even if you do 
> implement them as part of the host, using the usual plugin API 
> instead of internal "special" stuff might make it easier to get 
> things right.
>
> Will it make the users experience better?

Does a driver really count as part of the plugin? 
If not, should it really be part of GMPI?

Interesting, but my suggestion is to wait with it at least 
until more essential parts of the spec have been sorted out. 
We don't have the slightest idea of the core yet. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: