On Sat, 17 May 2003, B.J. Buchalter wrote: > Well, in the context of the host itself (where we don't have to worry about > these issues), I see it as being very useful. Think about all the folks who > did (and still do) sweetening with sequencers and samplers. It is a > compelling model to have a library of samples properly configured and not > have to worry about the editing model -- just place the events. But it may > introduce too many complications to deal with this in a modular fashion due > to the macroscopic control/event lookahead required to make it work. I feel it would be a better solution to have an API for the sampler to tell the host where its syncpoints are, and the host to represent that to the user.. the events are always sent for the start of the sample, but the host is able to represent them to the user as being at the sync point. It's a user perception issue, not an event scheduling one. Regards, Angus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe