[gmpi] Re: Requirements
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:10:38 -0800
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:15:05AM +0100, Frederic Vanmol wrote:
> > Agreed. An infact LADSPA has no chromed UI mechanism.
> >
>
> But you do agree that GMPI should have the possibility of a chromed UI for
> plugins, don't you? If it doesn't have this, then it's doomed from the start.
I changed this to read:
GMPI must define an in-process customized UI mechanism. Hosts are
not required to support this, but graphical hosts are strongly urged
to do so.
Then provided more on XML+layered bitmaps.
> It could be a requirement, however, that a plugin be (almost) fully
> controllable through parameters, so that a host that doesn't support it,
> doesn't have to show the chromed UI.
That is already a requirement:
GUIs are not part of a DSP plugin with private access to the DSP
internals. All communication between UI and plugin is via standard
control signals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
