[gmpi] Re: Reqs draft
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:25:47 +0000
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:54:42AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > It is not a problem to provide extensible categories. If your supplying a
> > library of 100 subtly different allpass filters, you need to create some
> > new categories.
>
> So it's easier to define a new category that has one plugin in it than it is
> to just write that in the docs and let the user sort as he wishes? How do
> you propose sane extensible categories without every plugin defining their
> own categories?
Why should the user be made to sort the plugins himself? If plugins create
new, pointless categories for themselves (and dont also place themselvels
in any useful category), then thats a bug, just like any other bug.
> > I agree that its neccesary, if you try to use a host under linux that
> > doesnt have category support it is realy anoying to find anything.
>
> Umm, hosts problem?
Great, but the user suffers.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
