[gmpi] Re: Reqs draft
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:18:27 -0500
>>In terms of requirements, without going into implementation details, we need
>>a registration system with the following attributes:
>>- Avoids versioning conflicts, i.e., plugin version 2 overwrites version 1
>>and projects which contain version 1 start blowing up.
>>- Avoids naming conflicts, i.e., 2 plugins by competing vendors called
>>Reverb.DLL.
>>- Allows the user to organize and categorize to suit their needs.
>>- Supports "safe" and "friendly" diagnosis/uninstall/reinstall by users and
>>support personnel.
>
>a great list. lets just add
>
> - Allows a plugins to be installed on both a system-wide and
> per-user basis.
restated to reflect a recent comment from time:
- Allows plugin to be installed at various "access levels", ranging
from per-user to system-wide or even network-wide. Simultaneous
installation and an ordered way to find the preferred
installation should be provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
