[gmpi] Re: Reqs draft
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:19:58 -0800
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:15:17PM +0100, Vincent Burel wrote:
> > The flip side is that I find it SO convenient when the host just doesn't
> > know the difference between native and wrapped plugins.
>
> i feel SO convenient that we are talking about wrapping GMPI on an other
> format while
> -1- GMPI SDK does not exist.
> -2- If you make an Plug-in SDK it's usually not to be wrapped from an other
> format (or it sound like a failure somewhere).
> -3- if GMPI means that it means then there won't be wrapping, and industry
> will go to the GMPI naturally.
> -4- The wrapping makes sens to become compatible with a popular format and
> GMPI is not popular for the moment (it does not exist :-), so there won't be
> wrapping before years.
The first GMPI hosts won't have a lot of GMPI plugins. That is why wrapping
VST/DX/AU is so important. We must handle it well.
--
Notice that as computers are becoming easier and easier to use,
suddenly there's a big market for "Dummies" books. Cause and effect,
or merely an ironic juxtaposition of unrelated facts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
