[gmpi] Re: Reqs draft
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:24:46 -0800
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:21:59PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I don't like inconsistency, but I am willing to accept this compromise.
> > What do you all think?
>
> Yes, I dont like having two distinct approaches - we could do what someone
> suggested and have all plugins produce metadata by inspection, and have
> the installer cache the metadata in a disk format, except where the plugin
> flags its metadata as dynamic.
>
> That makes it slightly more integrated, and the ondisk metadata format
> would be standard.
Let's get people to agree to ANY compromise before we optimize :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
