[gmpi] Re: Reqs Discuss: 1-11
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:56:17 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3:46 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Reqs Discuss: 1-11
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:28:18 +0100, Vincent Burel wrote:
> > but i don't understand "int32_t instead of DWORD"
> > - firstly because one is signed the other not.
> > - secondly because these type are both platform independent
>
> DWORD is not platform independent, only windows supports it, all
> platforms (claim to) support POSIX/C99 types.
it's defined as platform independent and anybody is able to define it on
every platform.
if you want to define UINTxx instead of (D)(Q)WORD i'm not against.
> *WORD is somewhat confusing, as I dont think any of us are using machines
> where the word type is 16bits wide, plus how does it describe signed
> types?
that you want ! for example
INT16,
INT32,
INT64,
VB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
