[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.9. Time - opening arguments.1

  • From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:17:10 -0500

>I agree with Koen if these changes came from a plug, they could be
>recorded by the host as automation-type events if desired. I imagine this
>stream tempo being alot like current realtime sync via midi clocks or
>ReWire. Since most hosts can handle that kind of sync these days, I'm not
>sure why it would be too difficult to add support for it from a plug.
>Could someone elaborate? Some current hosts record a new tempo map while
>sync'ed to external clocks (slaved), and some others don't, while on
>others it's a user option.
>I see a complication though if multiple plug-ins want to be sync master
>to the host.  There would have to some explicit selection of multiple
>possible masters, or implicit rules for who's in charge. I imagine a plug
>would notify the host that it wants to be sync master and the host would
>manage things one way or another if there were multiple choices, perhaps
>via a ReWire-style registration method.

Since there is no way to find out the capabilities or approach of
ReWire without signing an NDA, can you please explain what mean
whenever you mention a ReWire feature?

Can ReWire support varispeed?


Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: