[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.9. Time - opening arguments.1

  • From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:47:55 -0500

>On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:24:44PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>> UST has defined, externally meaningful units (usecs or nanosecs) and
>> is guaranteed monotonic. If you two events of any kind with two UST
>If it is guaranteed linear, then you don't need a UST timestamp per event.

i never said "guaranteed linear". thats not what monotonic means.

>I can grok that.  Finally, I grok that.  BuT now I don't see why you need
>UST per event, if it is linear, it has a defined relationship to the sample
>UST(sample) = UST_base_offset + sample * UST_per_sample

you can't know UST_per_sample. its not guaranteed constant. both the
UST timeflow and the audio sample clock have drift.

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: