On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:49:11AM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote: > > Yes, a critical question is how offline processing is handled within a > > graph. ie Can a plug request to simply grab the host's audio selection > > for offline processing, without going through the rest of the graph? > > > > For special purpose plugs like I'm proposing, it might be that the user > > simply has to insure (or the plug itself checks) that it is in a graph by > > itself, to avoid the possible complications? > > It's not just this example, I think most offline plugins need to be run > solo. If you have several, you apply each to the entire song, one at a time > (multiple passes). > Offline plugins may have 'random' access to the audio, 'lookahead', change > the tempo map etc. You can't stream from one offline plugin to another (in > general). So the interesting part that remains is how to build a tempo-map and hand it back to the host? Is tempo something special? Is there a generic solution for this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe