[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.9. Time - opening arguments

  • From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:51:12 -0500

>time?  Also, how do you handle the increasing market for higher sample
>rates?  192 kHz Music Time?  eeek.  I was thinking more like 96-384 ticks
>per beat makes sense (tick being an immutable unit of music time).  It works
>pretty well in music software today.

1920 is a better number. it allows integer representation of several other
beat subdivisions than 384 does. its what ardour uses, anyway.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: