[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:44:15 +0000
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:57:57 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Quick summary on the topic (is anyone around this week?)
>
> * Several people voted YES for ramps
> * No one voted NO
>
> * It has been suggested that a ramp be thought of as a (duration, target)
> pair, which makes sense to me ((x, y), (run, rise), etc).
>
> * It has been suggested that there ONLY be one type of event - ramped.
> Point-value events have a duration of 0, and controls which do not do
> ramping can merely ignore the duration. This simplifies connections
> between outputs and inputs.
>
> * It has been suggested that we need more complex ramps than linear, and it
> has been countered that linear is all we can push.
>
> Anyone want to keep debating? What's the decision for these requirements?
Not really. I'd rather there was only one kind of event - it saves hosts
from worrying about translating between ramps and sets and may make incoming
event parsing simpler.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
