On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:49:20PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > I'm OK with something like this. Plugins that don't want to handle ramping > > can get pseudo-ramped by the host. Plugins that can handle it themselves > > will. Is the max update rate needed? It makes things obvious, I guess. > > Not sure. What do others think? > > I think its overcomplex (supprise ;). OK, there are some parameters which > the plugin cant/wont update very often, inevitably users will want to > connect them to LFOs or something equally inapropraite, but why stop them? I'm not advocating stopping them. Quite the contrary, I was saying that inputs and outputs should be flagged as ramping/not-ramping and the host can deal with that however it likes. If I want to put an LFO onthe delay time, I should be able to. > We did discuss non-RT controls IIRC, but I cant remember what we decided. > Was it just that they would be hinted to produce non-RT friendly behaviour > when changed? I think that was the general consensus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe