[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8

  • From: RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:26:09 -0500

>>>
i continue to believe that on a given platform (for any given definition of
a "platform"), a GMPI graph should contain one data type to represent PCM
data, just one, and only one. the GMPI SDK would include header files that
define this data type for each platform (it would clearly be trivial to add
new ones if a developer needed it):
<<<

Yes, 110% agree.

>>>
the plugins written for a cell phone will never run on an x86 or PPC based
DAW, and vice versa. please, lets stop coming up with a scheme that pretends
that multiple sample types in the same graph is a good idea, because it
doesn't really help anybody out (it confuses users, creates more work for
host developers, and creates a choice for plugin developers which is
frequently a bad idea). 
<<<

Yes, 150% agree.

One type per plugin binary, one type per graph.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: