[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.6 and 3.7 (was Reqs section 3.6)

  • From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:19:19 -0800

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:01:14PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > As has already been established, we can't PREVENT a plugin having a native
> > half and an out-of-process half.  The question is whether we want to require
> > that to be standardized, so plugin developers only need to invent the
> > out-of-proc half, using a standard IPC and native half.
> Its not quite that simple - it depends on the automation model - if the
> host routes parameter changes then its neccesary for GMPI to specify some
> kind of IPC to allow out-of-process guis to work with automation.

We're saying the same thing, I think.  Either every plugin that wants to do
out-of-process stuff solves this problem themselves, or we require that GMPI
help them out.

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: