[gmpi] Re: +++ RESET +++ (was RE: a little order?)

  • From: NoelBorthwick@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:21:07 -0500

>>Here is version 0.01 of the list:

I'd like to add to the design list the following:
One of the issues that came up in the MMA meeting was the idea of a "tiered
implementation model".
i.e. a host application or plugin vendor may choose to implement various
levels of the GMPI feature set depending on needs. 
Clearly the full GMPI specification when its finally done could be fairly
large and daunting if one had to implement it in full at host or plugin
level to start out. 
The spec should be designed in a way that permits a such a modular
implementation approach. A vendor may choose to start with Level 1 features
and progress to higher level features as desired. 

This may help reduce the inertia in moving to the new model. 


Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: