[gmpi] Re: R: Re: Topic 4: Host Interface
- From: "Angus F. Hewlett" <amulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 07:20:53 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Bill Gardner wrote:
> I must be missing something. I have a very centralized view of the host as
> the master of timeline, data flow, and external I/O devices. The host is
> often the source of time ordered content such as sample data, musical
> events, automation. How can transport control (stop, rewind, play) not be
> related to controlling the data in the flow graph?
Simple, obvious, example: in Cubase VST, the "graph" (really just the
audio engine and a MIDI front-end) is running even when the transport is
stopped. It's easy to envisage a Reaktor-style environment where there
may be several different transport masters existing within a single
synchronous signal flow graph.
> In my centralized view, this could only happen if the host provides an
> interface for a plug to control the transport.
Plug-ins can advertise their ability to be transport masters, and their
requirement for receiving transport information. It's up to the host to do
what it likes with that.
Regards,
Angus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
