On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, chris jones wrote: > Have i missed it or is there realy no presance from Steinberg & Emagic. Did > either of those companies show any interest in GMPI at NAMM? It seems apart > from our loverly host mr Kuper everyone else here is a plugin developer > rather than a host developer. Steinberg thinks VST(i) is standard and wants to keep it that way. Emagic thinks Audio Units is, and Apple wants to keep it that way. Afaic, the mistakes (AU = mac-only, ..) and missing documentation (VST has no worthy documentation to speak of, ..) is what prompted Ron to start this list. But Ron is also the "Enemy" as he's on Cakewalks payrole ;-))) Welcome to the Bold and the Beautifull. However, straying off topic we should not, 'cos it'll get us kicked and banned. And very rightly so. cheers, - bram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe