Personally, I think that no one would 100% agree or be 100% happy with any
standard. I'm not even 100% happy with my own 5 years old plugin system
because of some initial mistakes.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:11:40AM +0100, Didier Dambrin wrote:Yes it's exactly what I was saying.
To which I was replied 'let's not get back on the subject', meaning that GMPI is already locked before even being used?
But note that it's just an opinion because I do agree I didn't participate in this thing, wasn't at namm & shouldn't really have a word to say.
As a host developer, I *want* you and others to have a word to say. I think we've already reached a good compromise on the requirements, and you won't be too unhappy with it. I think it's a win-win compromise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe