[gmpi] Re: MIDI: Questioning semantics
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:12:27 -0700
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:07:03PM -0700, Chris Grigg wrote:
> The point is, formally speaking, OSC-style addressing per se is not
> any more of a guarantee of Total Rewindability than MIDI is.
>
> The assertion that OSC-style addressing makes plug state more
> knowable than MIDI does is not formally correct.
That's correct. I hope I never asserted that. What I asserted is that
MIDI is interpretted directly by the plugin, without the host knowing. If
anyone wanted OSC to go directly to the plugin, I'd say the same thing -
how is the host supposed to manage that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
