On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:18:51 +0200, Koen Tanghe wrote: > That's why I also think Jack O'Quin's proposal (gmpi_encode_midi_exact and > approx) seems more appropriate: > - we won't have MIDI bytes flowing around for nothing in the future > - the people who really need the MIDI bytes will be able to do what they > want (and only they will need to do the conversions) > - we encourage people to use the GMPI messaging protocol +1, its especially easy to deprecate in the future (when GMPI 1.1 does away with this ;) as the function will just return NULL (or the euivalent). And in the short term its more effecient as hosts that want to support it can keep the MIDI around, but dont have to send it to every plugin. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe