From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:12:09PM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote: > > with audio and still have the MIDI inputs control the plugin? I see > > only disadvatages to merging control into a single protocol and thus > > no longer using standard MIDI. > > Martijn, > > I'm a bit frustrated by your insistence that ONLY MIDI can do you what you > want, without providing any really concrete examples. I'm not convinced that this system provides full MIDI compatibility. If it does it will be such much alike MIDI that it won't be able to support the features some want without really being two seperate protocols.. > If you're really happy with MIDI, I'll personally help you write > GMPI->MIDI shim that you can use in all your plugins. I'm happy with MIDI for my usage, but I agree that another protocol might be better for another usa case. Why not support several control protocols? I might get equally frustrated with not getting clear arguments as to why having more than one protocol for instrument control is a problem. --ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe