[gmpi] Re: MIDI: Common event coding
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:35:32 -0700
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:15:24AM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I agree. If it were *much* harder, the choice would be more obvious. :)
> > But I think we're more or less happy with a compromise concept for now
> > (reqs reqs reqs!) :)
>
> votes--. I am *very* unhappy with this "compromise".
I apologize if I missed or overlooked your concerns - can you tell me,
for my own sake, what they were?
Please keep in mind that we are doing requirements, not spec. No proposal
is final, not for some time, yet.
> What happens after the requirements phase is complete? Will the MMA
> members go off into a smoke-filled room, ignore all these good ideas,
> and do whatever they wanted to in the first place?
A good question. Ron?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
