[gmpi] Re: Item 0: Agenda

  • From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:01:36 +0100

On Thursday 13 February 2003 18.04, RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Cool.  I like the idea of moving threading (11) right after host
> interface (4), though I'm not so sure about persistence and GUI. 
> In particular, I think a discussion about persistence should come
> after we discuss parameter representation, since it's like that
> parameter values will be among the things that get persisted.
> Similarly, I think a discussion of GUI might need to happen after
> we talk about signal routing and persistence, if we are talking
> about the GUI as a kind of "parameter setter" and "preset loader."

Yeah, you're right. Both persistence and GUI sort of depend on the 
parameter interface (which could be built on top of, or be part of 
the control interface), so both should probably be discussed after 
the control/parameter stuff.

//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate

.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
   --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: