[gmpi] Re: Generalized Music Plugin Interface list is now online

  • From: Marc Poirier <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:18:08 +0100 (CET)

> > (I'm strongly opposed to using wrapped MIDI messages for several=20
> > reasons. Ask if you want the full list. ;-)
> What exactly do you mean with wrapped MIDI messages? passing
> struct { unsigned char[3] }?

Another paradigm for representation that is not based directly on the 
obtuse, bit-stingy data that flows between MIDI cables.  ;)  In other 
words, let it be the host's (or maybe even internally part of the API's) 
responsibility to parse MIDI events, if they are supported, and convert 
them into a more intelligible format for the plugins.  This (a) makes 
things easier for plugs and makes it so that there isn't as much redundant 
MIDI parsing code written and (b) allows the interfaces musical 
representation system to exceed the limitations of MIDI, while still being 
able to work with MIDI data.


Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: