[gmpi] Re: GUI and DSP separation
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:49:43 +0000
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:28:47 +0100, Marc Poirier wrote:
> > Can you explain why its done this way? It also seems useful for the UI to
> > express what DSP components it can control. For example, in LADSPA we have
> > UIs that can control any (or a subset of) plugins. Possibly both are
> > desirable.
>
> Yeah, I can see where you're coming from, sounds like that could be
> useful. I guess with AU, there's a sort of exception which is that there
> is a generic GUI component (comes with the OS) which you can assume will
> work with any DSP component. But that's as far as it goes, so far, in
> that direction...
In the linux world we have the situation where the UIs are mostly
developed seperatly form the plugins, and there are maybe a dozen or so
different, aproximatly generic LADSPA UIs.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
