[ ***** WARNING: Massively Off Topic content ***** i am replying to this on-list only i believe that the original message contains incorrect information. ] >there is definitly a common demonitator for a user interface. There is >always an equivalent of a window handle on each platform that we have worked >on: > >1) Windows - HWND >2) Mac - WindowRef >3) XWindows - Widget > >The host provides this and the plugin can do with it whatever it wants. It >just has to install its event handlers for that window. Based on that you >can develop UI kits that allows easy porting between platforms. with the utmost respect (because i know you guys have your stuff running on all 3 platforms), this is just wrong. on 2 counts. a "widget" is not part of the Xlib specification. its a term developed by various toolkits layered on top of Xlib, starting with Xaw (the athena widgets, the original toolkit for XWindow). what the term "widget" means varies from toolkit to toolkit. in particular, and this is critical, in some toolkits, a widget may or may not have its own underlying window (ie. it may update itself on the screen by drawing on the window of its parent, or its parent's parent, etc.). that is, having a widget doesn't mean you have anything on which its possible to draw graphics. the equivalent of an HWND/WindowRef in XWindow is an XWindow. its not a particularly useful basis for implementing stuff that is going to integrate with host applications, because host applications use higher level toolkits than Xlib, with good reason: it would be a nightmare to write a host application in Xlib or even in something like vstgui. most of the toolkits don't provide very good interfaces for adding "foreign" windows to the event loop handler. it can be done, its just not pretty and its not something most people would want to work with. they might if its the only choice they have. to explain it a different way, my host is written using GTK+. its not going to work well with a plugin GUI written using anything except GTK+, even though the underlying abstraction provided by Xlib is common to both. this is true for all existing XWindow toolkits, including but not limited to Xaw, Motif, GTK+ and Qt. you could, of course, have an implementation of vstgui using one of these toolkits (or even plain Xlib). thats great for the plugins that use vstgui, and for the hosts that use the chosen toolkit. for everyone else, its not going to work (well). you windows/macos folk, or you folk who feel its OK to just lay down the law and say "use our toolkit", you don't know how easy you have it :) --p ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe