[gmpi] Re: Drilling down into MIDI->GMPI conversion
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:28:58 +0100
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:46:22 -0400, Ron Kuper wrote:
> >>>
> It was precisely to avoid this screaming match that I proposed extending
> MIDI in GMPI with float fields -- and timestamps and note IDs make sense
> too. I still don't see why this wouldn't satisfy both camps here. As far
> as I can see it is the simplest change to existing protocols that can
> handle the requirements for increased functionality.
> <<<
>
> I would be 127% in favor of extended MIDI to suit the needs of GMPI. If
> you guys can stomach SysX as the container for this, we can make it
> happen pretty easily and quickly. SysX is merely a packet by another
> name. (If it's not Sysx that whatever extensions we send on the cable
> will break existing gear.)
Only if youre proposing dropping all the non GMPI-SysEx packets, which I
dont think you are. Otherwise the host has no chance to interpret the
plugins behaviour.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
