On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:47:36AM -0600, Chris Laurence wrote: > I suppose this is as good a place for me to jump in as any. Greetings to > all. Welcome aboard. > it is off the table for those supporting MIDI in GMPI. I know that I am > interested in MIDI in GMPI as a bridge to the future if I may use a cliche. What part of MIDI do you need to bridge into the future that NMiG model does not provide? In fact, GMPI is the bridge between MIDI and the future. > Plugin developers are lazy. Yep. So what? Why shouldn't they be with > To address a concern which has not been expressed, but may be implied. If > MIDI is available, what incentive is there for controller manufacturers to > develop beyond MIDI? This, I believe, assumes too much laziness. In fact, So on one hand you assert that developers are lazy, and rightly so. Then you assert that they're not *that* lazy. Look, if I believed that MIDI input would only be used for a tiny slice of legacy transition plugins, I wouldn't be so against it. But Ron and Chris and Martijn and crew are making me believe more and more that *lot's* of plugin makers, especially synths, will use MIDI-only and give GMPI control the middle finger. Then we've invented an API for almost NO practical gain. I want consistency. And as long as I believ that the majority will just use MIDI because it's what they know and what they have code for, then I am against it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe